Gender is a solution to problems without questions. It, like language, introduces a dilemma that it allegedly “solves.” The problem is one of signification: how do humans symbolize one another, and how do we relate these symbols to the humans to which they pertain? In the case of gender, we use genitals to glue the symbol to the person. This process is not just inappropriate; it’s invasive, conceptually flawed, ethically dangerous, and socially divisive.

The prenatal cannot consent to having their picture taken.

Ultrasounds are used to determine the genitalia of unborn babies. If a penis is found, then the baby is “assigned male,” and is called a “boy” in virtue of this maleness. Ultrasounds cannot detect prenatal vaginas, however; it either finds or does not find a penis. If a penis is not found, then the baby is “assigned female,” and is called a “girl” in virtue of this femaleness.

I think “gender reveal parties” should be more accurately named “prenatal genital reveal parties.” Baby penises and vaginas should be made into cakes and balloons for adults to celebrate all the upcoming gender expectations that will be placed upon the child. This is of course perverse and inappropriate, which to me accurately reflects the perverse inappropriateness of assuming someone’s gender based on their genitals.

It’s also absurd to me that genitals — the basis of pervasive, institutionalized sexing and gendering practices — are too scandalous to be seen on public television, and yet…